MANGALABAI GAJANAN TALELE v. AJAY ARUNRAO PADOLE AND ANR
CA/2843/2020 · 2025-10-16
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65558 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65558 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 11 ca 2843.20 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2843 OF 2020 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 4673 OF 2017 Mangalabai Gajanan Talele .. Applicant Versus Ajay Arunrao Padole and another .. Respondents Shri Madhav M. Bhokarikar, Advocate for the Applicant.
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 16TH OCTOBER, 2025.
FINAL ORDER : .
Learned counsel for the applicant undertakes to take steps to serve the respondent No. 1.
2. For the reasons stated in the application it stands allowed in terms of prayer clauses 'b' and 'd'. The civil application is
disposed of.
[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME J. ] bsb/Oct. 25 2025:BHC-AUG:29555