Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6555 (RAJ)

IRSAD S/O AASMOHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2096/2025 · 2025-02-12

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2096/2025 1. Irsad S/o Aasmohammad, R/o Village Jodhpur, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 2. Shokin S/o Jabru, R/o Village Jodhpur, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2097/2025 1. Mustkim S/o Jagrup, R/o Village Jodhpur, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. 2. Soyam S/o Fakru, R/o Village Jodhpur, Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ankit Khandelwal For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 12/02/2025 1. Apprehending their arrest in connection with FIR No.393/2024 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg for the offence(s) under Sections 303(2), 317(2), 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 308(2), 121(1), 132 and 61(2)(b) of BNS and Sections 66D & 67a of IT Act and Section 3 of PDPP Act, the (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2096/2025] petitioners have preferred these anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 B.N.S.S. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in the case. He further submits that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate. It is also contended that custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required and they are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, therefore, these anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor vehemently opposes the anticipatory bail applications. 4. Heard and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the fact that the matter is exclusively triable by Magistrate and custodial investigation of the petitioners is not required and they are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation, without commenting anything on the merits of the case, I deem it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail applications of the petitioners. 6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail applications under Section 482 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the petitioners namely- 1. Irsad S/o Aasmohammad 2. Shokin S/o Jabru 3. Mustkim S/o Jagrup & 4. Soyam S/o Fakru, in connection with FIR No.393/2024 registered at Police Station Pahari, District Deeg, shall be released on bail, provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer of the concerned (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2096/2025] Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioners shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J DEEPA RANI -27-28