COCP-5655 IN THE HI 108 Dharampal Sh. Pankaj Y CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. violation of Division Be ‘Dharampal was directed 03.02.2025 ( weeks from due opportu Corporation. 2. submits that P-2), represe vide Speakin has been rem 5655-2025 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND H COCP Date o mpal Versus nkaj Yadav, IAS M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate fo Mr. Naveen Sheoran, Addl. A.G I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The present contempt petitio on of order dated 09.09.2025 (An on Bench of this Court in LPA- ampal vs. The State of Haryana and ot irected to pass an appropriate order u 2025 (Annexure P-1) moved by the pe from the date of receipt of certified co pportunity of hearing to the petition ration. At the very outset, learned ts that in compliance of the order representation dated 03.02.2025 (Anne peaking Order dated 12.12.2025 (Ann en removed. As such, nothing survives ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH COCP-5655-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 17.03.2026 .… Petitioner .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA cate for the petitioner. dl. A.G., Haryana. petition has been filed alleging (Annexure P-2) passed by the -1432-2025 titled as titled as and others’ whereby the respondent order upon the representation dated the petitioner within a period of 08 fied copy of the said order by giving etitioner as well as the Municipal arned counsel for the respondent order dated 09.09.2025 (Annexure (Annexure P-1) stands disposed of (Annexure R-1) and encroachment urvives in the present petition. ging as dent ated f 08 ving ipal dent xure d of ent RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.17 20:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. COCP-5655 3. aforesaid sub 4. 5. required to b of, according 6. 7. 17.03.2026 rishu 5655-2025 (O&M) -2- Learned counsel for the petitio aid submissions of learned counsel for Heard. In view of the facts noted ed to be passed in the present petition ordingly. Rule stands discharged. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable petitioner is unable to dispute the sel for the respondent-State. above, no further orders are tition; and the same stands disposed any, shall also stand disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE ned Yes/No Yes/No the are sed RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.17 20:06 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.