IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50020 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-419 Year-2019 Thana- BUDDHACOLONY District- Patna ====================================================== 1. Sushil Kumar Singh S/O Uma Kant Singh Resident of Flat No. 302, Veena Mansion Apartment, Nageshwar Colony, Boring Road, P.S.- SK Puri, District- Patna. 2. Purusottam Kumar Singh S/O Surendra Singh Resident of Flat No. 304, Krishna Kunj Apartment, Baba Lodge, Sri Krishna Nagar, P.S.- SK Puri, District- Patna. 3. Raj Kumar Singh @ Raj Kumar S/O Rajendra Prashad Singh R/O Singh Bhawan, Near HRDT School, Shivpuri Road NO. 1, Rajvanshi Nagar, P.S- Shastri Nagar, Distt.- Patna. 4. Brajindra Singh Batra S/O Dalip Singh Batra Director of Imperia Structures Limited, A-25, Mohan Cooperative, Sarita Vihar, P.S- Greater Kailash, Distt.- South Delhi, New Delhi- 110048. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Abhiyank Sinha S/O Braj Bhushan Prasad Sinha R/O C-404, Monika Apartment, Opposite Jagdeo Path, Khajpura, Bailey Road, P.S- Raja Bazar, Distt.- Patna. 3. Bhawna D/O Braj Bhushan Prasad Sinha R/O C-404, Monika Apartment, Opposite Jagdeo Path, Khajpura, Bailey Road, P.S- Raja Bazar, Distt.- Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anuraj Singh,Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Mritunjaya Kumar Gautam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 2 22-06-2026 Heard the parties. 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioners very fairly submits that the petitioners have approached this Court for quashing of the FIR but by the efflux of time, the chargesheet have been filed and cognizance has been taken against the petitioners. Therefore, he seeks Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50020 of 2025(2) dt.22-06-2026 2/2 permission to withdraw this application with the liberty to challenge the order taking cognizance. 3. Permission is accorded. 4. Accordingly, the present application is disposed of as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioners. 5. It is clarified that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case. Jyoti/- (Praveen Kumar, J) U T