M/S SIMNANI CONSTRUCTIONS v. P. K. BHAT AND ANR. (SALES TAX)
CCP(D)/4/2025 · 2025-06-30
Sanjay Parihar, Sanjeev Kumar
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6554 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6554 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
S. No. 41
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
CCP(D) 4/2025 in[WP(C) 197/2025] M/S SIMNANI CONSTRUCTIONS …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: None. Vs.
P. K. BHAT AND ANR. ...Respondent(s) Through: None. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR, JUDGE HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SANJAY PARIHAR, JUDGE
O R D E R 30.06.2025
1. This is a petition for initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents for willful disobedience and non-compliance of the judgement dated 04.02.2025 passed by this Court in WP(C) No.197/2025.
2. Respondents have filed their statement of facts and have taken a categoric stand that the petitioner has only submitted the copy of the judgement dated 04.02.2025 but has not complied with any of the direction recorded in the said order. The petitioner has neither filed any application seeking restoration of GST number personally or through online mode nor has the petitioner made any effort to file return GSTR3B and deposit outstanding amount of tax, interest and penalty. He has not completed any of the formality attending on restoration of registration certificate.
3. In view of the stand taken by the respondents, the petitioner cannot be permitted to take the benefits of his own wrongs as he has not
complied with the part of the directions which were required to be complied with by him and therefore, cannot seek the initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents. The contempt petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed.
(SANJAY PARIHAR) (SANJEEV KUMAR) JUDGE
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 30.06.2025 Ishaq