DEEPAK DAS ALIAS DIPAK DAS v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./2379/2025 · 2025-07-01
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6554 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 6554 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:JHHC:17408] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.2379 of 2025
------ Deepak Das @ Dipak Das, aged about 22 years, S/O-Ashish Das, R/O Village- Pandeydih, P.O. + P.S.- Jamtara, District- Jamtara
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... …. Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate
For the State
: Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 01-07-2025 I.A. No.7547 of 2025
Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that this interlocutory application has been filed with a prayer for early hearing of the instant bail application.
Since, the hearing of instant bail application is taken up today, hence, this interlocutory application stands rejected being infructuous.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) B.A. No.2379 of 2025
The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 registered under Section 111 (2) (ii), 317 (2), 319 (2), 318 (4), 338, 336 (3), 340 (2) and 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Section 66 B, 66 C and 66 D of the Information Technology Act.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and four mobile phones with different active SIM Cards, two ATM Cards and one motorcycle was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that the petitioner has been implicated in this case merely on the
basis of suspicion and there is no money trail involved in this case. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-22 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co- operate with the trial of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.01.2025 as is evident from para-22 of the instant bail application. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail.
Learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is
directed to be enlarged on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.40,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Cyber Crime, Jamtara in connection with Jamtara Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.05 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/