Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65520 (ALL)

JYOTI SAXENA v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/8023/2024 · 2025-01-27

Prakash Padia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:13985 Court No. - 7 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 8023 of 2024 Petitioner :- Jyoti Saxena Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Kamal Kumar Kesherwani Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Shivendra Singh Bhadauria Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J. 1. Heard counsel for the parties and perused the record. 2. The petitioner has preferred the present writ petition inter-alias with the prayer to direct the respondents to make the payment of interest to the petitioner on delayed payment of gratuity. 3. Today when the matter is taken up, it is admitted between the counsel for the parties that the interest of delayed payment has already been made in fovour of the petitioner. 4. In this view of the matter, it is argued by Shri Shivendra Singh Bhadauria, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondent Nos. 3 & 4 that petition has become infructuous. 5. This fact has been very fairly accepted by Shri Kamal Kumar Kesharwani, learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner. 6. In this view of the matter, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Order Date :- 27.1.2025 Swati Digitally signed by :- SWATI PATHAK High Court of Judicature at Allahabad