IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 333 OF 2025 Petition under Section 115 of C.P.C., aggrieved by the non disposal of E.A.No.62 of 2022 in E.P.No.22 of 2022 in F.D.P.No.508 of 2000 in O.S.No.58 of 1988 on the file of the court of the Senior Civil Judge at Nandigama, Krishna District. i Between: 1. Mannem Balakrishna Reddy, S/o.Peri Reddy, aged about 46 year, R/o.Pochmpalli Village, Jaggayyapet Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Mannem Parvathamma, W/o.Peri Reddy, aged about 65 years, R/o.Pochmpalli Village, Jaggayyapet Mandal Krishna District. ...Petitioners/Claim Petitioners/S'^'* Parties AND 1. Mannem Punna Reddy, (died) S/o.Venkata Reddy, aged about 80 years, R/o.Pochmpalli Village, Jaggayyapet Mandal, Krishna District. 2. Mannem Lakshmi, D/o.Punna Reddy, aged about 40 years R/o.Pochmpalli Village, Jaggayyapet Mandal, Krishna District. ...Respondents/Respondents/Defendants Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty Counsel for the Respondents: None Appeared The Court made the following Order: I, I i / / APHC010061712025 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) Hii'H sfe [3299] FRIDAY ,THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF MARCH TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 333/2025 Between: Mannem Balakrishna Reddy and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Mannpm Piinnp RoHH\/ anr^ n+horo - — ... . ^ Li I O I O ...RESFONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): TSAI GANGADHAR CHAMARTY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 333/20?.^ ORDER: Heard Sri K.R.Raghavendra Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners. 2. The plaintiff/respondent No.2 is the decree holder in O.S.No.58 of 1998 which was filed for partition against the father/respondent No.1 deceased. Preliminary decree was passed. The same was challenged A.S.No.3661 of 2003, which was later on withdrawn Th0rP3ft^^r tho finol Woorao E.P.No.22 of 2022 in FDP.No.508 of 2000 in O.S.No.58 of 1998. , who is now in on 08.07.2022. / o ^aoocu ai lu \ A fO vv a \/vcii> puL to execution in . . 1 3. In EP.No.22 of 2022, the present petitioners who are the 3"'^ parties filed EA.No.62 of 2022 under Order 21 Rule 97 to 101 R/w. Section 151 CPC. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said application i pending for consideration and prays that EA be decided expeditiously. IS 5. For the order proposed to be passed, issuance of notice to the respondent is dispensed with. 6. Considering that such claims deserve expeditious disposal, so also for expedition in execution of decree, this Civil Revision Petition is being disposed of finally, without observing anything on the merits of the claim of the petitioners, with direction to the Execution Court that if there is no other legal impediment, it shall proceed to decide E.A.No.62 of 2022, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six months from the date a copy of this order is produced before such Court. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall also stand closed. Sd/- N NAGAMMA assistant registrar r //TRUE COPY// \ SECTION OFFICER \ To , Krishna District. The Civil Judge (Senior Division), Nandigama Sri Sai Gangadhar Chamarty, Advocate [OPUC] 1. 2. OneCCto 3. Three CD Copies SAM vna HIGH COURT DATED:28/03/2025 ORDER CRP.No.333 of 2025 DISPOSING OF THE CRP WITHOUT COSTS