Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65501 (ALL)

TINKU v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

BAIL/20213/2025 · 2025-09-15

Samit Gopal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 20213 of 2025 Court No. - 64 HON'BLE SAMIT GOPAL, J. 1. List revised. 2. No one appears on behalf of the applicants to press this application even in the revised list despite the fact that there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter. Sri Sanjive Kumar Gupta, learned counsel for the first informant/opposite party no. 2 is also not present. Sri Ajay Kishore Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State is present. 3. This bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. has been filed by the applicant Tinku, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 118 of 2025, under Sections 137(2), 96, 65(1) B.N.S. and 3/4(2) Protection of Children From Sexual Offences Act, 2012, registered at P.S. Wazirganj, District Budaun. 4. Since there is no representation on behalf of the applicant although there are two learned counsels appearing in the matter, the present bail application is dismissed in non prosecution. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. September 16, 2025 Naresh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Dr. Arun Srivastav, Vishal Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Sanjive Kumar Gupta (Samit Gopal,J.) Tinku .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NARESH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad