Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65490 (KAR)

SANTOSH S/O GOVIND DIVATAGI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/104369/2025 · 2025-11-26

S Rachaiah

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16530 CRL.P No. 104369 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH CRIMINAL PETITION NO.104369 OF 2025 (438(Cr.PC)/482(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SANTOSH S/O. GOVIND DIVATAGI, AGE. 25 YEARS, OCC. JOB, R/O. PLOT NO.59, SAYYAD COMPOUND, UDYAMBAG, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-591102. 2. SUNIL S/O. GOVIND DIVATAGI, AGE. 28 YEARS, OCC. JOB, R/O. PLOT NO.59, SAYYAD COMPOUND, UDYAMBAG, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-591102. 3. BABLU @ SABIYAN S/O. SAMBJAN BEPARI @ GORI, AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. JOB, R/O. PLOT NO.55, SAYYAD COMPOUND, UDYAMBAG, TQ. AND DIST. BELAGAVI-591102. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. PRASHANT MATHAPATI, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY UDYAMBAGS P.S., BELAGAVI, REPRESENTED BY S.P.P., HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, BENCH DHARWAD. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. JAIRAM SIDDI, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 438 OF CR.P.C.(UNDER SECTION 482 OF BNSS, 2023) PRAYING TO, GRANT ANTICIPATORY BAIL TO THE, PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO.2 TO 4 IN UDYAMBAG P.S. CRIME NO.0053/2025 PENDING ON THE FILE OF JMFC IV COURT BELAGAVI FOR OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 189(2), 191(2), 191(3) 109(1) AND 109 OF BNS AND ETC.,. Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16530 CRL.P No. 104369 of 2025 THIS CRIMINAL PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.RACHAIAH) 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners have filed a memo, dated 26.11.2025, which reads as under: “Herein the advocate for the petitioner begs to submit as follows: That the above petition filed for seeking anticipatory bail as per the instruction petitioners does not proceed with matter. Hence, Petition may be kindly have dismissed as not pressed”. 2. Persued, the memo. 3. Having considered the said memo, it is appropriate to dismiss the petition as the petition becomes infructuous. Ordered accordingly. Sd/- (S.RACHAIAH) JUDGE NM/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 22