Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65470 (BOM)

TULSHRIRAM PARBATRAO BIRADAR (DIED) THR LRS LAXMIBAI TULSHIRAM BIRADAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR

CA/6388/2020 · 2025-11-07

Shri Neeraj P Dhote

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 924-CA.6388.2020.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6388 OF 2020 IN RC/349/2020 TULSHRIRAM PARBATRAO BIRADAR (DIED) THR LRS LAXMIBAI TULSHIRAM BIRADAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR ... Mr. Audumbar G. Shinde h/f. Mr. Ravindra Vitthal Gore, Advocate for Applicant; Mr. B. A. Shinde, AGP for Respondents-State. ... CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 7th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C.:- 1. This is an application for restoration of the first appeal, which was dismissed for non-removal of office objections, which were pointed out by the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court. 2. Learned Advocate for the Applicant states that due to oversight, the office objections could not be removed in time. He further submits that, if the appeal is restored, the office objections shall be removed within a period of two weeks. 3. For the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B), subject to payment of cost of Rs.1,000/- to the office of High Court Legal Services Sub-committee, Aurangabad. 2025:BHC-AUG:30606 2 of 2 924-CA.6388.2020.odt 4. Upon restoration of the appeal, the office objections shall be removed within a period of two weeks. 5. Application is disposed of. (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) Tauseef