1 25.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD. 25 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11170 OF 2014 IN FAST/24254/2014 MAHEBOOB GULAM RASOOL VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Charudatta K. Sonawane & Mr. N. R. Thorat. AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. D. J. Patil. ... CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. DATE : 17th November, 2025. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. 2 This is an application for condonation of delay of 405 days caused in filing the first appeal. 3 The learned AGP strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4 On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned on certain conditions. 5 For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. The appeal be registered. 2025:BHC-AUG:31652 2 25.odt 6 It is made clear that in case the amount of compensation is enhanced, the appellants shall not be entitled for the amount of interest for the delayed period. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga