Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65462 (PAT)

Sangram Yadav @ Mritunjay Sahitya v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./54446/2025 · 2025-08-25

Satyavrat Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54446 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-41 Year-2019 Thana- CIVIL LINE District- Gaya ====================================================== Sangram Yadav @ Mritunjay Sahitya S/O Mahesh Kumar R/O Gopi Bigha, P.S.- Magadh Medical, Dist.- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Abhay Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Rajendra Singh- A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 2 25-08-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in Civil Lines P. S. Case No.41 of 2019 registered for the offences punishable under Section 379 of the Indian Penal Code. 3. The learned A.P.P., at the outset, submits that the case is of the Year 2019 and the petitioner has approached this Court in the Year 2025, when his anticipatory bail application twice was rejected by the learned District Court in the Year 2019 and petitioner carries antecedent of three cases which amply demonstrates that petitioner is moving at his leisure. 4. On query of the Court with regard to the stage of the case, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54446 of 2025(2) dt.25-08-2025 2/2 petitioner submits that investigation has been completed and charge-sheet has been submitted against the petitioner. 5. The Court is not inclined to extend the privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner for the reason that petitioner at his leisure moved before this Court seeking anticipatory bail and also taking into consideration the facts that he has antecedent of three cases. 6. The prayer of the petitioner for anticipatory bail stands rejected. vikash/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T