RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 104 (33 cases) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Ramotar Yadav and ors. State of Haryana CORAM: Present: HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Appeals, are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. convenience, facts are being culled out from RFA No. 2. laid to the decision dated District Judge, 3. acres situated within reve No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases (33 cases) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH ***** Date of Decision: RFA No. Ramotar Yadav and ors. Versus State of Haryana & ors. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Sh. Ajay Jain, Advocate and Sh.Tarun Yadav, Advocate for the appellants/landowners Mr. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana --- HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) Vide this common order, a bunch of Appeals, details of which are given in the footnote of this judgment, are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. convenience, facts are being culled out from RFA No. By way of filing the present appeal the decision dated 27.08.2008 District Judge, Narnaul-cum-Reference Court Brief facts of the case are that acres situated within revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, Hadbast No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under other connected cases [1] IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 22.08.2025 RFA No.2644 of 2009 (O&M) …….Appellants Versus .….Respondents MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Sh. Ajay Jain, Advocate and Sh.Tarun Yadav, Advocate /landowners. Abhinash Jain, DAG, Haryana Vide this common order, a bunch of 33 Regular First details of which are given in the footnote of this judgment, are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common acquisition/Award involving common facts and question of law. For convenience, facts are being culled out from RFA No.2644 -2009. way of filing the present appeal(s) challenge has been 27.08.2008 passed by learned Additional Reference Court. Brief facts of the case are that land measuring 41.76 nue estate of Village Buchakpur, Hadbast No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under Regular First details of which are given in the footnote of this judgment, are being decided as all the appeals have arisen out of common For challenge has been passed by learned Additional land measuring 41.76 nue estate of Village Buchakpur, Hadbast No. 160, Tehsil Narnaul, District Mahendergarh was sought to be acquired vide Govt. Notification dated 21.7.1998 issued under RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed by notification d purpose, namely, development and utilization Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, assessed the market value of the acre along with all 13.7.2001. 3. petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market value. It has been further ple to Sector as residential it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 sq. yards having greater potential. 4. consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated 27.08.2008 awarded/enhanced the compensation square yards alongwith all Section 23(1 5. 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed by notification dated 16.7.1999 issued Section 6 thereof, for public purpose, namely, development and utilization Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, assessed the market value of the acquired land acre along with all other statutor 13.7.2001. Feeling aggrieved, the landowners filed reference petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market value. It has been further pleaded that the land in question is adjacent to Sector-1 which is already developed in all respects as residential-cum-commercial locality of Narnaul City. Furthermore, it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 ds away from the Highway and near having greater potential. The Reference Court, after examining and taking into consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated 8.2008 awarded/enhanced the compensation square yards alongwith all other statutory benefits as available under Section 23(1-A), Section 23(2) and Section 28 of the Act. Seeking further enhancement other connected cases [2] Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed ated 16.7.1999 issued Section 6 thereof, for public purpose, namely, development and utilization of land as Sector Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, acquired land @ Rs.2,00,000/- per statutory benefits vide award dated Feeling aggrieved, the landowners filed reference petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market aded that the land in question is adjacent 1 which is already developed in all respects been planned commercial locality of Narnaul City. Furthermore, it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 away from the Highway and near the Canal Colony; thus The Reference Court, after examining and taking into consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated 8.2008 awarded/enhanced the compensation @ Rs. 190/- per statutory benefits as available under A), Section 23(2) and Section 28 of the Act. Seeking further enhancement, the landowners/appellants Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short 'the Act'), followed ated 16.7.1999 issued Section 6 thereof, for public of land as Sector-1 Part, Narnaul. The Land Acquisition Collector (for short ‘LAC’), after considering the location and potentiality of the acquired land, per y benefits vide award dated Feeling aggrieved, the landowners filed reference petitions under Section 18 of the Act pleading that the compensation assessed by the LAC was inadequate in view of prevailing market aded that the land in question is adjacent planned commercial locality of Narnaul City. Furthermore, it has been asserted that the land in question is situated about 300 thus The Reference Court, after examining and taking into consideration all the material available on record, vide order dated per statutory benefits as available under the landowners/appellants RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) preferred dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, also preferred appeals. 6. appearing for the appellants submits Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with respect to the revenue estate of Villag acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has assessed compensation at the uniform rate of Rs.386/ and thus the landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of land under acquisition pertaining to Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court be enhanced. 7. interference was called for with the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases preferred present appeals, while the respondent dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, also preferred appeals. Impugning the aforementioned Award, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with respect to the revenue estate of Villag acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has assessed compensation at the uniform rate of Rs.386/ and thus the same compensation should landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of land under acquisition pertaining to Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court be enhanced. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that erference was called for with the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court for the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur other connected cases [3] appeals, while the respondent-State being dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, Impugning the aforementioned Award, learned Counsel appearing for the appellants submits that the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with respect to the revenue estate of Village Narnaul, which has been acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has assessed compensation at the uniform rate of Rs.386/- per sq. yards should be awarded in favour of landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the learned Reference Court be enhanced. On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that erference was called for with the market value assessed by the for the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur e being dissatisfied with the award passed by the learned Reference Court, Impugning the aforementioned Award, learned Counsel that the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur and Narnaul are abutting and adjoining and therefore, similar market value should have been awarded for both the revenue estates. Learned counsel further submits that with e Narnaul, which has been acquired vide same notification dated 21.07.1998, issued under Section 4 of the Act and for the same purpose, this Court has per sq. yards awarded in favour of landowners of the revenue Estate of Village Buchakpur as well. Learned counsel for the appellants also refers to paragraphs No.39 and 40 of the Reference Court Award to submit that the factum of the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur being of potential and locational advantage has even been acknowledged and thus the market value assessed by the On the other hand, learned State counsel submits that no erference was called for with the market value assessed by the for the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur. RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms part of notification Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as such the land situated with which is the subject matter of present acquisition equated for the purpose of assessment of m that of Village Narnaul. once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur only, notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court be set aside 8. through the paper on behalf of the appellant 9. Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition forming part of revenue estate of Village Buch developed Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage besides having potential value of the Reference Court award in this regar 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms part of notification dated 21.07.1998 issued under Section Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as such the land situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, which is the subject matter of present acquisition equated for the purpose of assessment of m that of Village Narnaul. Learned State counsel also submits that once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur only, the same cannot notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court be set aside. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the paper-book(s). I find substance in the submissions made on behalf of the appellants/ landowners A perusal of the award passed by the learned Reference Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition forming part of revenue estate of Village Buch developed residential colonies and is also Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage besides having potential value as well of the Reference Court award in this regar other connected cases [4] He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms dated 21.07.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, which is the subject matter of present acquisition could not be equated for the purpose of assessment of market value as similar to Learned State counsel also submits that once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village same cannot be relied upon being post notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone . I find substance in the submissions made s/ landowners. A perusal of the award passed by the learned Reference Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition forming part of revenue estate of Village Buchakpur is situated near residential colonies and is also adjoining Narnaul Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage as well. Relevant paragraphs 39 & 40 of the Reference Court award in this regard, are extracted He submits that the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which forms 4 of the Act was just abutting the already developed Sector 1, Narnaul and as the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, could not be similar to Learned State counsel also submits that once the sale exemplar in the form of Ex.P8 dated 19.11.1999 was available on record which pertains to the revenue estate of Village be relied upon being post- notification and therefore, the amount awarded by the LAC is to be upheld and the impugned judgment by the learned Reference Court I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone . I find substance in the submissions made A perusal of the award passed by the learned Reference Court clearly establishes the fact that the land under acquisition akpur is situated near Narnaul- Mahendergarh Road and as such is having locational advantage . Relevant paragraphs 39 & 40 d, are extracted RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) hereunder: 10. situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having locational advantage as well as potential value because geographical location developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. Narnaul- another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases hereunder:- “39. There are other factors which proves that the valuation done by the Land Acquisition Collector is meager. The land is situated near already developed residential colonies of Narnaul. Sh. Devender Kumar Patwari. Shiv Colony Nagar are situated adjacent to the land acquired for Sector-1 part acquired land is potential for residential and commercial There are two highways near the acquired land namely Narnaul Road and Narnaul 40. In all those cases where the market value of the acquired land has to be assessed there is bound to occur some guess work. Since the land is situated adjacent to the already developed land to Sector-1 Part required to develop the acquired land. Classification of the land as chahi, barani or gair mumkin is also not required, as a house built on a barani land is as good as that built on a chahi or gair mumkin land.” In view of the fact that the land under situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having locational advantage as well as potential value because geographical location and forms part of the vicinity of already developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. -Mahendergah and Narnaul-Singhana Road another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul other connected cases [5] There are other factors which proves that the valuation done by the Land Acquisition Collector is meager. The land is situated near already developed residential colonies of Narnaul. Sh. Devender Kumar Patwari. Shiv Colony and Moti Nagar are situated adjacent to the land acquired 1 part-1 as admitted by RW1 Thus the acquired land is potential for residential and commercial There are two highways near the acquired land namely Narnaul-Mahendergarh Road and Narnaul-Singhana Road. In all those cases where the market value of the acquired land has to be assessed there is bound to occur some guess work. Since the land is situated adjacent to the already developed land 1 Part-1, so a very little effort is equired to develop the acquired land. Classification of the land as chahi, barani or gair mumkin is also not required, as a house built on a barani land is as good as that built on a chahi or gair mumkin land.” In view of the fact that the land under acquisition which is situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having locational advantage as well as potential value because of its part of the vicinity of already developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. Singhana Road and also abuts another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul There are other factors which proves that the valuation done by the Land Acquisition Collector is meager. The land is situated near already developed residential colonies of Narnaul. Sh. and Moti Nagar are situated adjacent to the land acquired 1 as admitted by RW1 Thus the acquired land is potential for residential and commercial There are two highways near the Mahendergarh In all those cases where the market value of the acquired land has to be assessed there is bound to occur some guess work. Since the land is situated adjacent to the already developed land 1, so a very little effort is equired to develop the acquired land. Classification of the land as chahi, barani or gair mumkin is also not required, as a house built on a barani land is as good as that built on a chahi acquisition which is situated within the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur having of its part of the vicinity of already developed residential colonies; situated near two highways i.e. abuts another chunk of land forming part of the revenue estate of Narnaul RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) and the said land of Village Na existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which was notification dated also for the same purpose 11. revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, Narnaul; Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated at some distance chunk of land of Village Buchakpur and Narnaul; suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of Rs.386/- revenue estate of Village on 22.08.;2025 part of the per sq. yards (Rs.386 appellants/ landowne benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases and the said land of Village Narnaul immediately existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which was notification dated 21.07.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Act also for the same purpose. Thus, considering the fact that the land forming part of the revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, Narnaul; and the land forming part of reve Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated at some distance from already existing Sector 1, Narnaul, chunk of land which forms part of Village Narnaul exists between the land of Village Buchakpur and the already developed Sector 1, in such circumstances, it would be appropriate in case a suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of per sq. yards which has been revenue estate of Village Narnaul in RFA No.4392 of 2006 decided on 22.08.;2025. The market value for the land acquired the revenue estate of Village Buchakpur comes to Rs.347/ per sq. yards (Rs.386 – 10%) i.e. Rs.16,65,600/ appellants/ landowners shall also be entitled for all other statutory benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of other connected cases [6] rnaul immediately abuts the already existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for the revenue estate of Village Narnaul which was acquired vide same 21.07.1998 issued under Section 4 of the Act and onsidering the fact that the land forming part of the revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, the land forming part of revenue estate of Village Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated from already existing Sector 1, Narnaul, as the part of Village Narnaul exists between the the already developed Sector 1, in such circumstances, it would be appropriate in case a suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of has been assessed in relation to the in RFA No.4392 of 2006 decided . The market value for the land acquired and forming revenue estate of Village Buchakpur comes to Rs.347/ 10%) i.e. Rs.16,65,600/- per acre. The rs shall also be entitled for all other statutory benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of the already existing Sector 1 Narnaul, it would be more appropriate to rely upon the assessment of market value made in terms of land acquired for acquired vide same and onsidering the fact that the land forming part of the revenue estate of Village Narnaul abuts the already existing Sector 1, nue estate of Village Buchakpur, adjoins the acquired land of Village Narnaul, but situated as the part of Village Narnaul exists between the the already developed Sector 1, in such circumstances, it would be appropriate in case a suitable cut of 10% is applied over and above the market value of assessed in relation to the in RFA No.4392 of 2006 decided forming revenue estate of Village Buchakpur comes to Rs.347/- The rs shall also be entitled for all other statutory benefits and interest provided under the provisions of 1894 Act (as amended upto date). It may further be noted here that in case, any of RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of th present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the deceased shall be entitled to draw benefit of the pre qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution applications in this regard. 12. landowners are filed at the instance of State 13. disposed of. 22.08.2025 sanjay Sr. No. Case No. 1 RFA No. 2. RFA No. 3. RFA No. 4. RFA No. 5. RFA No. 6. RFA No. 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of th present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the deceased shall be entitled to draw benefit of the pre qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution applications in this regard. Consequently, the appeal landowners are allowed in the aforesaid terms; filed at the instance of State are hereby Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. .08.2025 Whether speaking/reasoned? Whether Reportable? Case No. Title RFA No.4815/2006 OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.4809/2006 HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.5592/2008 SMT. KESHAR KAUR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND RFA No.5691/2008 SMT.GURDAYAL KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.1173/2007 HOSHIAR SINGH HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.1174/2007 HOSHIAR SINGH HARYANA AND ORS. other connected cases [7] the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of th present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the deceased shall be entitled to draw benefit of the present judgment qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution Consequently, the appeals filed by the appellants in the aforesaid terms; whereas the appeal hereby dismissed. Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned? Yes/No Yes/No OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SMT. KESHAR KAUR VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SMT.GURDAYAL KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HOSHIAR SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. HOSHIAR SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. the landowners/ appellants having expired during the pendency of the present appeal and his/her/their legal representatives or legal heirs have not been impleaded, in view of the State amendment carried out under Order 22 Rule 3 (2) of CPC, 1908, the legal heirs of the sent judgment qua its enforcement directly by preferring appropriate execution filed by the appellants/ the appeals Pending misc. application(s), if any, shall also stand (HARKESH MANUJA) OM PARKASH VS. STATE OF HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. VS. SMT. KESHAR KAUR VS. STATE OF SMT.GURDAYAL KAUR (DECEASED) THROUGH HER LRS VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 7. RFA No. 8. RFA No. 9. RFA No. 10. RFA No. 11. RFA No. 12. RFA No. 13. RFA No. 14. RFA No. 15. RFA No. 16. RFA No. 17. RFA No. 18. RFA No. 19. RFA No. 20. RFA No. 21. RFA No. 22. RFA No. 23. RFA No. 24. RFA No. 25. RFA No. 26. RFA No. 27. RFA No. 28. RFA No. 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases RFA No.292/2008 HARI SINGH AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.296/2008 JAI SINGH AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.295/2008 RAMOVTAR AND ANR. HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.294/2008 SMT. BIRMATI HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.297/2008 MANGAL RAM HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.293/2008 LEKH RAM AND ORS. HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.298/2008 JASWANT SINGH HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.4816/2006 JAI PARKASH HARYANA AND RFA No.50/2007 BHIM SINGH AND ORS. OF HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.5406/2008 SAJJAN SINGH HARYANA AND RFA No.5407/2008 NETAR PAL AND ANOTHER STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RFA No.552/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND BHIM SINGH AND ORS. RFA No.553/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. SAJJAN SINGH AND ANR. RFA No.554/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. RFA No.555/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.MANGAL SINGH AND ANR. RFA No.556/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RAM AVTAR AND ORS. RFA No.557/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. SMT.BIRMATI AND ORS. RFA No.558/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. LEKH RAM RFA No.559/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.HARI SINGH AND ORS. RFA No.763/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.JAGAT SINGH AND ANR. RFA No.764/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JAI SINGH AND ORS. RFA No.776/2007 STATE OF JAI PARKASH AND ANR. other connected cases [8] HARI SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. JAI SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. RAMOVTAR AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SMT. BIRMATI VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. MANGAL RAM VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. LEKH RAM AND ORS.VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. JASWANT SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. JAI PARKASH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. BHIM SINGH AND ORS. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. SAJJAN SINGH VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. NETAR PAL AND ANOTHER VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. BHIM SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. SAJJAN SINGH AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. HARBHAJAN SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.MANGAL SINGH AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RAM AVTAR AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. SMT.BIRMATI AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. LEKH RAM AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.HARI SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS.JAGAT SINGH AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JAI SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JAI PARKASH AND ANR. VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE OF VS. STATE VS. STATE OF VS. ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. HARYANA AND ANR. VS. RFA-2644/2009 (O&M) 29. RFA No. 30. RFA No. 31. RFA No. 32. RFA No. 22.08.2025 sanjay 2644/2009 (O&M) & other connected cases RFA No.797/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. NETARPAL AND ORS. RFA No.1033/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JASWANT SINGH AND ORS. RFA No.1034/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. DEVENDER KUMAR RFA No.1035/2007 STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. OM PARKASH AND ANR. 22.08.2025 other connected cases [9] STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. NETARPAL AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. JASWANT SINGH AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. DEVENDER KUMAR AND ORS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. OM PARKASH AND ANR. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR. VS. (HARKESH MANUJA)