IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 148 SAMEER @ SONU GUPTA STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Present: Ms. Aakriti Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Raman Sharma, ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that illegally demanded enhanced cost of the plots without without furnishing the details under protest and sent a representation to the respondents (Annexure P-3) but disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 3. At the asking of the Court, M Punjab accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 4. Heard. 5. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 27.11.2024 (Annexure P IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16484-2025 DATE OF DECISION: 28.07.2025 SONU GUPTA Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA s. Aakriti Sharma, Advocate for Mr. Raman Sharma, Advocate for the petitioner. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that illegally demanded enhanced cost of the plots without furnishing the details thereof. The petitioner had deposited the amount and sent a representation to the respondents 3) but the same has not been decided disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation dated 27.11.2024 (Annexure P-3) in a time bound manner Issue notice to the respondents. the asking of the Court, Ms. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. Heard. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated (Annexure P-3) in accordance with law within a period of IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 2025 DATE OF DECISION: 28.07.2025 … Petitioner (s) ... Respondent(s) ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK MANCHANDA Advocate for the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have illegally demanded enhanced cost of the plots without any justifiable cause and . The petitioner had deposited the amount and sent a representation to the respondents on 27.11.2024 the same has not been decided till date. The petition be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation in a time bound manner. Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated 3) in accordance with law within a period of two the respondents have any justifiable cause and . The petitioner had deposited the amount 27.11.2024 The petition be disposed of with a direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation Arundhati Kulshreshtha, AAG, In view of the above, the petition is disposed of with a direction to to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner dated SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.07.29 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16484-2025 -2- months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (DEEPAK MANCHANDA) JUDGE 28.07.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.07.29 12:39 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document