CRM-M No.33012 of IN TH 325 JITENDER KUM Vs STATE OF HAR CORAM: HON'B Present: Mr. N for th Mr. A HARKESH MAN 1. By w prayer has been m No.21 dated 01.0 deleted later on) a petitioner has be Birender @ Billu. 2. Pursu Ravinder, HPS, D Court, the same is 3. Lear petitioner is prima further submits th 11 months; not examined by the concession of reg of 2024 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CRM-M N Date of Dec KUMAR ALIAS AMIT ALIAS TEN HARYANA ON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH Mr. Nirmal Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Amit Aggarwal, D.A.G., Haryan **** ANUJA, J. (Oral) By way of present second petition been made for grant of regular bail to d 01.02.2021 registered under Sectio r on) at Police Station Sector-6, Dharu as been implicated with the allegati Billu. Pursuant to the last order, status re PS, Deputy Superintendent of Police ame is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner su s primarily based on suspicion of the w mits that the petitioner is in custody fo ; not involved in any other case; y the prosecution for the last two ye of regular bail. UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH M No.33012 of 2024 (O&M) of Decision: 08.01.2025 S TENDER ......Petitioner ....Respondent SH MANUJA aryana. tition filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C ail to the petitioner in case bearing FI Sections 302, 34 IPC (Section 34 IP Dharuhera, District Rewari wherein th llegations of having caused murder o atus report by way of affidavit of D Police, (HQ) Rewari, has been filed oner submits that the implication of th f the wife of deceased. Learned couns tody for the last more than 03 years an besides no witness having bee two years, thus, the petitioner deserve 1 Cr.P.C., ing FIR 34 IPC rein the urder of t of Dr. filed in n of the counsel ears and g been eserves MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.09 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CRM-M No.33012 of 4. The learned State cou wherein multiple out of total 16 pr date of hearing be 5. I hav paper book. I fin petitioner. 6. Prese in custody for the years not even a s commenting upon this stage primar there being no dir case, the present bail, subject to satisfaction of the 7. It is an opinion on the January 08, 202 Atik Whe Whe of 2024 (O&M) The prayer made on behalf of the te counsel while referring to the pos ltiple injuries are shown on the perso 16 prosecution witnesses, 10 witness ring before the Trial Court is 22.02.202 I have heard learned counsel for th . I find substance in the submissions Present is a case of circumstantial e for the last more than 03 years and 11 ven a single prosecution witness has b upon merits of the case, the trial bei rimarily on the basis of long incarc no direct evidence against him and h esent petition is allowed and the petit ct to his furnishing adequate bail of the concerned Trial Court/Duty Ma It is made clear that this order may n on the merits of the case. , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/N Whether reportable Yes/N of the petitioner has been opposed b he post mortem report of the decease person of deceased besides stating th itnesses have been examined and ne 025. for the parties and gone through th ssions made by learned counsel for th ntial evidence, wherein the petitioner and 11 months, besides for the past tw has been examined. Moreover, witho ial being carried out at a snail’s pace incarceration of the petitioner, beside and he being not involved in any oth e petitioner is ordered to be released o bail bonds and surety bonds to th uty Magistrate. may not be construed as expression o (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No 2 osed by eceased ting that nd next ugh the l for the tioner is past two without pace at besides ny other ased on to the ssion of MOHMED ATIK 2025.01.09 10:10 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment