Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65446 (ORI)

DAYANIDHI BURUDI v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/32368/2024 · 2025-01-07

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.32368 of 2024 Dayanidhi Burudi …. Petitioner Mr. R.N. Prusty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. A. Tripathy, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 07.01.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present Writ Petition inter alia with the following prayer: - “Direction to the Opp. Parties to pay him the benefits of regularization of service from his initial date of appointment with all the statutory benefits as due and admissible to him as per law which has been extended in favour of the similarly situated persons; And this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to quash the order No.541 dtd.16.02.2023 under Annexure- 8; And this Hon’ble Court may be graciously pleased to pay all the service benefits including the arrear salary other dues as admissible within a reasonable period”. 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a detailed representation before Opp. Party No.5 by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such a representation is filed within the aforesaid period, Opp. Party No.5 shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by the Opp. Party No.5 be communicated to the Petitioner. 5.1. It is observed that while considering the claim of the Petitioner relevancy and effect of the order passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No.33650 of 2023 shall be taken into consideration, if it is applicable. Petitioner is permitted to provide copy of this order and order passed in W.P.(C) No.33650 of 2023 along with his representation before Opposite Party No.5 for compliance. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Subrat Judge