Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.1724 of 2025
------
1. Meena Banerjee, aged about 64 years, w/o Dhiren Banerjee
2. Kavita Banerjee @ Kabita Banerjee, aged about 44 years, w/o Rajen Banerjee Both r/o village Parvatpur PO Batbinor PS Siyaljori, Dist. Bokaro, Jharkhand
.... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Parties
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Subhneet Jha, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Sudhir Kr. Mahto, APP
------
Order No.02 Dated- 18-03-2025 Heard the parties.
Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Chas(M) P.S. Case No.42 of 2021 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504 & 506 read with Section 34 of the IPC, 1860 and Sections 26, 30, 35, 25(1B)a of the Arms Act, 1959.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused caused criminal intimidation of the informant and his family members to grab their land. It is next submitted that allegation against the petitioners is false and petitioners were not present at the place of occurrence and except the statement of the co-accused person, there is no material in the record to implicate these petitioners in this case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security and they further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
-2- Learned Addl. P.P. and the learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs.10,000/- and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate -1st Class, Bokaro, in connection with Chas(M) P.S. Case No.42 of 2021 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile number during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita,
2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Anjali/