Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65429 (PAT)

Rahul Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./51995/2025 · 2025-07-25

R P Mishra

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.51995 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-39 Year-2024 Thana- CHIHARA District- Jamui ====================================================== Rahul Kumar S/O Premshankar Prasad Singh Village- Ambari, P.S.- Chihara, District- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Ankita Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Kumar Uday Pratap, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 2 25-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State. 2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Chihra P.S. Case No. 39 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Sections 30(a) and 32 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. The prosecution case, in short, is that total 1080 litres of liquor was recovered from the Truck. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement of apprehended co-accused person. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner is neither the owner nor the driver of the vehicle. The petitioner has got no concern with the alleged recovery of liquor. Learned counsel for Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.51995 of 2025(2) dt.25-07-2025 2/2 the petitioner, therefore, contends that prima-facie no case is made out against the petitioner. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Other co-accused persons have been granted regular bail by this Court vide orders dated 30.01.2025 and 18.07.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. Nos. 3838 of 2025 and 43949 of 2025 respectively. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chihra P.S. Case NO. 39 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarika Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Raj Ranjan/- (Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) U T