Cont.P.No.1976 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 26.09.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE Mr. JUSTICE A.D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA Cont.P.No. 1976 of 2025 1.P.J.Justin 2.M.Divya 3.S.Malathy 4.M.Steffy Joyce ...Petitioners Vs. 1.S.Augustin Premraj 2.J.Prince 3.Ebenezer V.Muthiah 4.H.Sharma Nithyanandam 5.Hamilton Wilson 6.The Chief Educational Chennai District, Chennai – 600 008. 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1976 of 2025 7.The Educational Officer, Kancheepuram District, Kancheepuram. ...Respondents (R6 and R7 suo motu impleaded by this Court by order dated 27.06.2025). Prayer: Petition is filed under Section 11 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, to punish the respondents for willfully disobeying the orders passed in WP.No.3500 of 2025 dated 20.02.2025. For Petitioners : Mr. S.Nedunchezhiyan For Respondents : Mr. V.Venkatesan 1 to 5 For Respondents : Mrs. S.Mythreye Chandru 6 & 7 Special Government Pleader (Education). 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1976 of 2025 ORDER Alleging that the orders of this Court dated 20.02.2025 in WP.No.3500 of 2025, has not been complied with, the present contempt petition is filed by the petitioners. 2. When the matter is taken up today, Mr.S.Nedunchezhiyan, learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this Court while disposing the Writ Petition had directed the 8th to 10th respondents therein to put up proposals for approval of the appointment of the petitioners. However, the proposals have not been put up. 3. Mr.V.Venkatesan, learned counsel for the respondents 1 to 5 would submit that this Court while disposing of the Writ Petition has directed them to put up the proposal for approval of appointment of the petitioners. However, no time limit has been fixed in the said order. He would submit that the respondents in due compliance of the order has forwarded the proposal to the 6th and 7th respondents for consideration. Thereby, the order of this Court has been duly complied 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1976 of 2025 with. 4. Heard the learned counsels on the either side and perused the records. 5. From the records furnished by the respondents 1 to 5 it is seen that the proposal in respect of the petitioners has been forwarded to the 6th and 7th respondents on 11.09.2025. Thus, the order of this Court has been complied with. 6. Mrs.S.Mythreye Chandru, learned Special Government Pleader (Education) appearing for the respondents 6 and 7, would submit that if the proposal is proper, it will be considered and orders will be passed. 7. Recording the same, the contempt petition is closed. No costs. 26.09.2025 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1976 of 2025 Index : Yes/No Internet : Yes/No kan A. D. JAGADISH CHANDIRA, J. kan 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis Cont.P.No.1976 of 2025 Cont.P.No.1976 of 2025 26.09.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis