Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65429 (KAR)

SRI GURUPRASAD S/O MALLANA GOWDA MALI PATIL v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/104825/2023 · 2025-11-06

Anant Ramanath Hegde

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15247 WP No. 104825 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 104825 OF 2023 (KLR-RR/SUR) BETWEEN: SRI. GURUPRASAD S/O MALLANAGOUDA MALI PATIL, AGE. 65 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KAVALOOR, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL-583 231. … PETITIONER (BY SMT. PALLAVI S. PACHHAPURE, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M.S. BUILDING, AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. 2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL, DIST. KOPPAL-583 231. 3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. 4. THE TAHASILDAR, KOPPAL, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. 5. SMT. MALLAMMA W/O LATE REVANAPPA GOUDA PATIL, AGE. 75 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. GATTIREDDYHALA-583 231, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. … RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. MALA B. BHUTE, AGA FOR R1 TO R4; SRI. IRANAGOUDA K. KOBBUR, ADVOCATE FOR R5) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER BEARING NO.KAM/APPEALU/34/2022-23/4270 DATED 05/01/2023 PASSED BY Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15247 WP No. 104825 of 2023 THE RESPONDENT NO.2/DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL MARKED AT ANNEXURE-G. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the dispute between the petitioner and the contesting private respondents has been adjudicated by the Senior Civil Judge, Koppal, in the original suit and the decision has been rendered in favour of the petitioner. It is further submitted that an appeal is pending before the Appellate Court. 3. Since the Civil Court has adjudicated the rights of the parties, nothing survives for consideration in this petition. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15247 WP No. 104825 of 2023 4. Hence, the petition is not considered on merits and is accordingly disposed of. 5. The Appellate Court shall decide the appeal on its own merits and in accordance with law, without being influenced by any observations made in this petition. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE PMP CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 59