Anantrao Madhavrao Kadam v. The state of Maharashtra Through Collector Latur
CA/13518/2025 · 2025-12-10
Shri Shailesh P Brahme
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65424 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65424 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 40-CA.13518-25+1.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 40 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13518 OF 2025 IN X-OBJST/35688/2025 IN FA/3540/2023 ANANTRAO MADHAVRAO KADAM VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH COLLECTOR LATUR WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13520 OF 2025 IN X-OBJST/35683/2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 13517 OF 2025 IN X-OBJST/35685/2025 ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Swami Sandeep Chandrakant. AGP for Respondent/s-State : Mr. N. R. Dayma. Advocate/DSGI for Respondent No.3 : Mr. Ajay G. Talhar. ...
CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.
DATE : 10.12.2025 PER COURT
:- In Cross Objections
1. Issue notice to the respondents.
2. Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondents/State. Learned counsel Mr. Talhar waives service of notice for respondent No.3. Civil Applications for Delay
3. Applicants seek to condone delay in preferring cross- objections. First appeals preferred by acquiring body is yet to be decided finally. The averments of the applications are not
2 40-CA.13518-25+1.odt denied specifically. The delay caused in preferring cross- objections stands condoned on condition that if the cross objectors succeed, they shall not be entitled to interest and statutory benefit for the delayed period.
4. Civil applications for delay are allowed.
(SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ... vmk/-