Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65416 (PNJ)

RUPINDER SINGH v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

CWP/16622/2025 · 2025-07-02

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-16622-2025 (O&M) 150 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA Rupinder Singh State of Punjab CORAM: HON HON Present:- Mr. Mr. Ashish Kaushik Ms. Mr. Akash Vashisth, Advocate for respondent No.5/PSPCL. SUDHIR SINGH Present Writ in the nature of amenities like electricity, sewerage roads, street lights etc. at the site in question immediately. 2. At the outset, l petitioner would be satisfied, in case, 14.11.2024 (Annexure which has not been adverted 3. On learned State counsel 2025 (O&M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA CHANDIGARH Date of decision: Rupinder Singh versus Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK JAIN Mr. A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate and Mr. Ashish Kaushik, Advocate for Ms. Arundhati Kulshrestha, AAG Punjab. Mr. Akash Vashisth, Advocate for respondent No.5/PSPCL. ***** SUDHIR SINGH, J. (ORAL) Present Writ Petition herein, inter alia in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents amenities like electricity, sewerage roads, street lights etc. at the site in question immediately. At the outset, learned counsel for the would be satisfied, in case, his (Annexure P-4) is considered and not been adverted to by the respondents till date. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, counsel and learned counsel for respondent No.5/PSPCL 1 of 2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16622-2025 (O&M) Date of decision: July 02, 2025 ….Petitioner ….Respondents SUDHIR SINGH ALOK JAIN A.P.S. Sandhu, Advocate and Advocate for the petitioner. Arundhati Kulshrestha, AAG Punjab. Mr. Akash Vashisth, Advocate for respondent No.5/PSPCL. inter alia, is for issuance of a Writ the respondents to provide basic amenities like electricity, sewerage roads, street lights etc. at the site in earned counsel for the petitioner submits that his pending representation dated and decided by respondent No.4, by the respondents till date. on advance service of copy of petition, and learned counsel for respondent No.5/PSPCL appear 2 2025 (O&M) , 2025 Petitioner s Writ provide basic amenities like electricity, sewerage roads, street lights etc. at the site in submits that dated , on advance service of copy of petition, appear MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.10 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment CWP-16622-2025 (O&M) 2 of 2 and oppose issuance of notice of motion. They submit that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent No.4 and it shall take decision either way, on the pending representation dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P-4). 4. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.4 to consider the pending representation dated 14.11.2024 (Annexure P-4) and pass an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, preferably within a period of 04 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. 6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (SUDHIR SINGH) JUDGE (ALOK JAIN) JUDGE July 02, 2025 mahavir Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No MAHAVIR SINGH 2025.07.10 12:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/ judgment