Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65408 (PNJ)

PAWAN SINGH AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/16030/2025 · 2025-08-08

Tribhuvan Dahiya

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CWP-16030-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 107 CWP-16030-2025 Date of Decision: 08.08.2025 Pawan Singh and another …Petitioner(s) Versus The State of Haryana and others …Respondent(s) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA Present:- Mr. Aditya Yadav, Advocate for the petitioners Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Senior Deputy Advocate General, Haryana TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA, J. (Oral) The petition has been filed inter alia seeking a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 16.04.2025, Annexure P-9, whereby the petitioners’ claim for promotion to the post of High School Headmaster under Physically Handicapped (PH) quota has been rejected on the ground that the Department is in the process of issuing reversion notices to the juniors. These juniors were promoted as High School Headmaster vide order dated 27.02.2023, based upon this the petitioners had claimed promotion. 2. The grievance raised in the petition is that despite rejection of the petitioners’ claim on the ground that the Department is in the process of issuing reversion notices to the juniors, it has not been done and instead, some of them have been further promoted as Principal. 3. Learned State counsel has received instructions from the second respondent vide memo dated 07.08.2025, which is retained on the case file as PAYAL 2025.08.13 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment CWP-16030-2025 -2- Annexure ‘A’. Referring to the same, she contends that employees junior to the petitioners, as detailed in the instructions, have already been issued show cause notices for reversion dated 17.07.2025, and appropriate action will be taken against them in accordance with law. 4. In view of the statement made, learned counsel for the petitioners has no objection to the petition being disposed of in terms thereof. 5. Ordered accordingly. 6. In case the appropriate action in accordance with law is not taken by the Department, the petitioners will be at liberty to approach this Court. (TRIBHUVAN DAHIYA) JUDGE 08.08.2025 Payal Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No PAYAL 2025.08.13 09:24 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment