(1) 950sa462.91.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 950 SECOND APPEAL NO. 462 OF 1991 SHAIKH CHAND SHAIKH PIRAN. ….Appellant VERSUS YASIN BADRUDDIN. …..Respondent None for the appellants CORAM : ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. DATE : 16th DECEMBER, 2025 PER COURT : 1. None appeared for the appellant. 2. Perused the record. It appears that on 28-11-2025, this court passed a detailed order, as no one appeared for the appellant, and the matter was kept under the caption ‘for dismissal’ today. Despite the foregoing facts, none appeared on behalf of the appellants. It seems that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. In view of the above, the second appeal stands dismissed for want of prosecution. 4. The interim relief, if any, shall stand vacated. 5. In view of the dismissal of the second appeal, the pending civil applications, if any, stand disposed of. [ABHAY J. MANTRI, J. ] VishalK/950sa462.91.odt 1 of 1