108 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP No.29593 of 2025 Date of Decision: 12.03.2026 Sandeep Kumar ….Petitioner vs. State of Haryana and others ….Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: Mr. Navneet Jindal, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Akshit Pathania, AAG, Haryana Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate for respondents No. 3 and 4 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. On 28.01.2026, the following order was passed: “ Counsel for the petitioner states that petitioner was awarded work of construction of road from Kranti Chowk to Tosham Chungi in SC Ward No.19, which was executed to the satisfaction of the authorities. He submits that petitioner raised a bill, but it has not been paid as the funds were not available. Advance copy of the petition has been served upon the respondents. On asking of the Court, Mr. Deepak Vashisth, DAG, Haryana, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.1 and 2. Mr. Ravish Kaushik, Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of respondents No.3 and 4 and requests for short accommodation to get instructions. List on 12.03.2026. PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.12 04:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP No.29593 of 2025 -2- On the deferred date, counsel shall make a specific statement mentioning the time line within which payment found due to the petitioner shall be disbursed.” 2. Learned counsel for Municipal Committee, Hansi submits that admitted dues of the petitioner would be cleared within three months from today. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner agrees to the aforesaid arrangement. 4. In the wake of statement of both sides, the petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 12.03.2026 paramjit Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes Whether reportable: No PARAMJIT KAUR SAINI 2026.03.12 04:25 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document