TAMIJABEE BISMILLA v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER
CA/11175/2014 · 2025-11-17
Shri Sanjay A Deshmukh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65392 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65392 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1 26.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY, BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
26 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11172 OF 2014 IN FAST/26964/2014 ABDUL RAHEMAN SK. BANNU SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LRS ALMNOORBEE SK. ABDUL RAHEMAN AND OTHERS VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Charudatta K. Sonawane & Mr. N. R. Thorat. AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. S. B. Jadhav. ... AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11176 OF 2014 IN FAST/26936/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11175 OF 2014 IN FAST/26956/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11169 OF 2014 IN FAST/26962/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11174 OF 2014 IN FAST/26958/2014 AND CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11173 OF 2014 IN FAST/26960/2014 ...
CORAM :
SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.
DATE : 17th November, 2025. P.C.: 1 Heard the learned counsel for the parties. Applications for condonation of delay: 2 These applications are for condonation of delay of 707 days caused in filing the first appeals. 2025:BHC-AUG:31648
2 26.odt 3 The learned AGP strongly opposed the applications and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. 4 On perusal of the applications, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned on certain conditions. 5 For the reasons stated in the applications, the delay stands condoned. The applications stand allowed in the interest of justice. The appeals be registered. 6 It is made clear that in case the amount of compensation is enhanced, the appellants shall not be entitled for the amount of interest for the delayed period.
[ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga