Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:103830 Court No. - 72 Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 18234 of 2024 Applicant :- Vikrant Srivastava@ Vikrant Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Prashant Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Giridhary Lal Choudhary Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the informant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge-sheet dated 15.02.2023, cognizance order dated 19.07.2023 as well as entire proceedings of Case No.3824 of 2023 (State vs. Vikrant Srivastava @ Vikrant Kumar) arising out of Case Crime No.59 of 2023, under sections 420, 406, 504,506 I.P.C., Police Station Chandausi, District Sambhal, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal at Chandausi. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the parties have amicably settled the dispute out of Court and on account of compromise entered between the parties on 06.05.2024, which is filed at Annexure 3 of the affidavit. This Court by order dated 04.11.2024 directed the parties to appear before the trial court for verification of compromise. Parties appeared before the trial court on 04.02.2025 and they have been verified by the trial court through their counsels and contents of agreement between the parties. Opposite party no.2 does not want to pursue the case further and proceeding be quashed in terms of compromise. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the opposite party no.2 submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the Court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 5. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 7. Accordingly, the impugned criminal proceeding in Case No.3824 of 2023 (State vs. Vikrant Srivastava @ Vikrant Kumar) arising out of Case Crime No.59 of 2023, under sections 420, 406, 504,506 I.P.C., Police Station Chandausi, District Sambhal, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sambhal at Chandausi is hereby quashed. 8. This application under Section 482 Cr.P.C. is accordingly allowed. Order Date :- 3.7.2025 SKD Digitally signed by :- SURJIT KUMAR DEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad