- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16415 RFA No. 100536 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100536 OF 2025 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. NAGAPPA S/O BHEERAPPA PUJAR, AGE. 54 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. GUTTAL, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI-581 108. 2. SRI. CHANDRAPPA S/O BHEERAPPA PUJAR, AGE. 34 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. GUTTAL, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI-581 108. … APPELLANTS (BY SRI. CHETAN T. LIMBIKAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SMT. GANGAMMA W/O BHEERAPP PUJAR, AGE. 76 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. GUTTAL, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI-581 108. 2. SMT. FAKKIRAVVA W/O BHEERAPPA MULAGUNDA, AGE. 51 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. LAKSHMESHWAR, TQ. LAKSHMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG-582 116. CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.11.27 12:54:30 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16415 RFA No. 100536 of 2025 3. SMT. CHOUDAVVA @ PARAVVA W/O KOTEPPA IDLI, AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. GUTTAL, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI-581 108. 4. SMT. HONNAVVA W/O CHANNAPPA GOGEPPANAVAR, AGE. 36 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. SHINGLI, TQ. LAKSHMESHWAR, DIST. GADAG, NOW AT: GUTTAL, HAVERI TALUK, DIST. HAVERI-581 108. 5. SMT. BHAGYAVVA W/O BASAPPA W/O INCHCHANGI, AGE. 31 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. BOMMANAKATTI, TQ. AND DIST. HAVERI-581 108. … RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE, 1908, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 24.02.2021 AND DECREE DATED 10.03.2021 PASSED IN O.S. NO.42/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM COURT, AT HAVERI AND CONSEQUENTLY, DISMISS THE SUIT OF THE PLAINTIFFS TO MEET THE ENDS OF JUSTICE. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT IS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:16415 RFA No. 100536 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) It is stated that the value of the plaintiffs’ share is ₹7,50,000/-. Hence, the appeal is not maintainable before this Court. 2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as not maintainable. 3. The appellants are at liberty to file an appeal before the jurisdictional District Court. 4. Registry to return the impugned judgment and decree to the appellants after retaining the xerox copy. 5. The time spent in prosecuting this appeal from 08.09.2025 till date shall to be excluded while computing the period of limitation. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE PMP CT:BCK/LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 4