IN THE HIGH COURT OF 107 Jagdish Singh The Punjabi University through its CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Clerk since 1990 Superintendent benefit of Old Pension Scheme 12.02.2025, Annexure P same has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondent bound manner, to which learned counsel opposite has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with the respondent IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Jagdish Singh Versus The Punjabi University through its Registrar CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Mukesh Arora, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Abhishek Kaushik, Advocate for Mr. Vipul Jindal, Advocate, for the respondent-University. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was working as since 1990 and regularized on 11.07.1991 Superintendent on 31.10.2024, however, benefit of Old Pension Scheme, regarding which 12.02.2025, Annexure P-2, has been served upon the respondent, has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondent bound manner, to which learned counsel opposite has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with the respondent to decide the legal notice dated PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16727-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 01.07.2025 ....Petitioner Registrar ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Abhishek Kaushik, Advocate for University. Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was working as and regularized on 11.07.1991, whereafter he retired as on 31.10.2024, however, he has not been granted the , regarding which a legal notice dated has been served upon the respondent, but the has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondent to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned counsel opposite has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to legal notice dated 12.02.2025, within a Learned counsel submits that the petitioner was working as a direction to PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.01 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-16727-2025 -2- period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to him and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to his interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 01.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.01 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.