Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65354 (ALL)

RAM BHEJ YADAV v. STATE OF U.P. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIC/18074/2025 · 2025-05-26

Manish Kumar Nigam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:91467 Court No. - 35 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 18074 of 2025 Petitioner :- Ram Bhej Yadav Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Anoop Kumar,Prashant Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pankaj Kumar Gupta Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. A mention was being made in the morning by learned counsel for the petitioner and in pursuance thereof, file has been summoned from the Registry and has been taken out of turn. 2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. 3. This writ petition has been filed seeking following relief :- "a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful possession of petitioner over land in dispute as alleged plot no. 1 क/35 area 162.058 hectare situated at Village- Duhi Bandhu Jot, Tehsil- Harriya, District-Basti during pendency of the case bearing Case No.2635 of 2025, Computerized Case No. T202517140102635 (Gaon Sabha Vs Ram Chandra & others) under Section 67 of U. P. Revenue Code, 2006." 4. Contention of learned counsel for the petitioner is that proceedings under Section 67 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006 are pending against the petitioner and the next date fixed in the matter is 10.6.2025. In the meantime, respondents authorities in order to file an affidavit in a contempt proceedings are trying to destroy the crop of petitioner alleging the same to be on the Government land and on 27.5.2025 has uprooted the crop of certain other persons. Photographs have also been annexed in this regard. 5. Learned Standing Counsel has submitted that no useful purpose would be served in keeping this writ petition pending and a direction be issued to respondent No.3 to decide the above-mentioned proceedings, in a time frame, as fix by this Court. 7. In view of the same, this writ petition stands disposed of with direction to respondent No.3 to conclude the above-mentioned proceedings, in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of three months after ensuring service of notice upon all the respondents and providing opportunity of hearing to all the concerned parties as well as giving a reasonable opportunity of leading evidence in respect of their case provided there is no other legal impediment. 8. Till disposal of the above-mentioned proceedings, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner. It is further provided that petitioner will co-operate in disposal of the above-mentioned proceedings and will not seek any undue adjournments to linger on the proceedings. In case any undue adjournments will be sought by the petitioner, interim protection granted by this Court shall automatically be vacated. Order Date :- 27.5.2025 Rishabh [Manish Kumar Nigam, J.] Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad Digitally signed by :- RISHABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad