Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6535 (JHR)

NISHIT MAHATO ALIAS NISIT MAHATO v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./2824/2025 · 2025-04-11

Ambuj Nath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:11157 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 2824 of 2025 Nishit Mahato @ Nisit Mahato, aged about 37 years, son of Durga Mahato @ Durga Charan Mahato, resident of near Shiv Mandir, Hathiyadih, P.O. Gamharia, P.S. Adityapur, District Seraikella-Kharsawan, Jharkhand. … Petitioner - Versus - The State of Jharkhand … Opp. Party ------ CORAM: - HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMBUJ NATH ----- For the Petitioner : Mrs. Vani Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, A.P.P. --- 02/11.04.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Adityapur P.S. Case No. 129 of 2024 (S), corresponding to POCSO Case No.31 of 2024, for the offences registered under Sections 363, 376, 504, 379, 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/ 4 of POCSO Act and Section 67(b) of I.T. Act. Charge has been framed under Section 23 of the POCSO Act and Section 67(B) of the I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Pr. District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, POCSO Court, Seraikella. Bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by this Court vide B.A. No.8952 of 2024 by order dated 11.12.2024. On 27.04.2024, the co-accused Arun Singh lured the victim to accompany him to Dobo Dam. Thereafter, Arun Singh raped her. It appears that two unknown persons came there and recorded the video of the entire occurrence and subsequently, the petitioner made the video viral. Considering the nature of allegation, I am not inclined to release the petitioner, on bail. Accordingly, his prayer for bail is hereby rejected. The learned trial court shall expedite the trial. (Ambuj Nath, J.) Jay/-