Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65345 (KAR)

CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD. v. KANTESH S/O HANUMANTAPPA MULIMANI

MFA/22125/2012 · 2025-12-13

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. MURALIDHARA PAI AND SRI PRASHANT MATHAPATI, MEMBER M.F.A.No.22125/2012 [WC] (Lok Adalat No.1050/2025) BETWEEN: CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, 2ND FLOOR, N.S.C. BOSE ROAD, CHENNAI, REPRESENTED HEREIN BY CHOLAMANDALAM M.S. GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., 9/1, ULSOOR ROAD, OPPOSITE GURUDWARA, BANGALORE-42, REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI R. R. MANE, ADVOCATE) AND 2 1. SHRI KANTESH S/O. HANUMANTAPPA MULIMANI, AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER, R/O. HEDIGGOND, TAL: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI. 2. SHRI BASALINGAYYA S/O. KALLAYYA HIREMATH, AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: OWNER OF VEHICLE NO.KA-27/A-1795, R/O. HEDIGGOND, TAL: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI. …RESPONDENTS THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 30(1)(A)(AA) OF THE WORKMEN’S COMPENSATION ACT, 1923, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 30/11/2011, PASSED IN WCA/NF NO.139/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE LABOUR OFFICER AND COMMISSIONER FOR WORKMENS COMPENSATION, HAVERI, AWARDING THE COMPENSATION OF RS.1,46,812/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 12% P.A. FROM THE DATE OF PETITION TILL ITS DEPOSIT. THE APPEAL BEING REFERRED TO LOK ADALAT, COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION, THIS DAY, THE LOK ADALAT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: 3 CONCILIATION ORDER Learned counsel for appellant/Insurance Company has appeared before the Lok-Adalath and filed a memo for withdrawal of appeal dated 12.12.2025, which reads as under : “MEMO FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL Herein, the Memo of Ravindra R. Mane, Advocate, for the Appellant, is as under:- The appellant does not want to prosecute this appeal further and wishes to withdraw the same, as the claimant has also agreed to withdraw the connected appeal registered at MFA No.25786/2012 filed by him seeking enhancement of compensation. Hence, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the top noted appeal as withdrawn and to transmit the amount in deposit together with the accrued interest, to the jurisdictional Civil Court, for being paid to the claimant.” 4 2. In view of memo dated 12.12.2025 filed by learned counsel for the appellant, appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. 3. The amount in deposit, if any, shall be transmitted to the concerned Tribunal, forthwith. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER CKK/CT-AN