IN THE HIGH 260 Jaswant Rai Manjit Kaur CORAM : HON Present: Mr. Ms. for t *** NAMIT KUMAR 1. The seeking quashing learned trial Cour petition have bee whereby warrant by the learned Ex 2. Noti to deposit of Rs.2 weeks. The said be issued to the re 3. Lear he is not able to g 4. In th prosecution. February 05, 202 Pankaj* IGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA CRM-M N Date of De Versus HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAMIT Mr. Prateek Sodhi, Advocate Ms. Jasmine, Advocate for the petitioner. *** UMAR, J. (ORAL) The petitioner has filed the instant p ashing of the order dated 07.06.2023 l Court whereby objections preferred ve been dismissed as well as order d arrant of attachment of saving account ed Executing Court. Notice of motion in the present case w f Rs.20,000/- as litigation expenses in t e said order has not been complied wit the respondent. Learned counsel for the petitioner sub le to get instructions from the petitioner In this view of the matter, the prese , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable D HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH M No.35403 of 2023 of Decision:05.02.2025 ... Petitioner ... Respondent MIT KUMAR stant petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C .2023 (Annexure P-4) passed by the erred by the petitioner to the execution rder dated 01.07.2023 (Annexure P- ccount of the petitioner has been issued case was issued on 18.08.2023, subjec ses in the registry within a period of two ied with and therefore, notice could no ner submits that despite his best efforts itioner. present petition is dismissed for non (NAMIT KUMAR) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No ARH r.P.C. by the ecution -5) issued subject of two uld not efforts, r non- PANKAJ KUMAR 2025.02.06 11:26 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Punjab and Haryana High Court Chandigarh