HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 2768 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the revisionist, learned A.G.A. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 and perused the record. 2. Supplementary affidavit filed today on behalf of the revisionist is taken on record. 3. It is submitted by learned counsel for the revisionist that the case pertains to under Section 138 N.I. Act and now entire amount has been paid by the revisionist to the opposite party no. 2. It is further submitted that Rs. 4,50,000/- had already been paid by the revisionist to the opposite party no. 2 and Rs. 50,000/- has been deposited by the revisionist in the court of learned Additional Civil Judge (J.D.), Court No. 6, Agra on 02.09.2025 and receipt thereof has been annexed alongwith supplementary affidavit. It is also submitted that now there is no dispute between the revisionist and opposite party no. 2. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 accepted the submission made by learned counsel for the revisionist and submitted that the entire amount has been paid by the revisionist to the opposite party no. 2 and now there is no dispute between them. 5. In view of the aforesaid submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, the order dated 23.04.2025 passed by the Judicial Magistrate/ Additional Civil Judge Junior Division, Court No. 4, Agra in Complaint Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Sunil Kumar Gaur, Vikas Thakur Prasad Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anup Kumar, G.A. Narayan Swaroop .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Case No. 937 of 2015 (Ghanshyam Vs. Narayan Swaroop), under Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Shahganj, District Agra and order dated 09.05.2025 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 16, Agra in Criminal Appeal No. 101 of 2024 (Narayan Swaroop Vs. State of U.P.) and another) under Section 138 N.I. Act, Police Station Shahganj, District Agra are hereby set aside. There is no need to extend the interim bail to the revisionist as the matter between the parties has come to an end. 6. Accordingly, the revision is allowed. September 24, 2025 Rmk. CRLR No. 2768 of 2025 2 (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAM MURTI KUSHWAHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad