p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL Nos.12744 & 12782 of 2024 In BLAPL No.12744 of 2024 -versus- State of Odisha ..... Opposite Party(s) Represented By Ms. B.K. Sahu, AGA In BLAPL No.12782 of 2024 -versus- State of Odisha ..... Opposite Party(s) Represented By Ms. B.K. Sahu, AGA CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANDA CHANDRA BEHERA Order No. ORDER 10.01.2025 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Since, both the bail applications under Section 483 of the BNSS have arisen out of one case vide G.R. Case No.2510 of 2024 in connection with Raghunathpalli P.S. Case No.468 of 2024 pending in the Court of learned S.D.J.M., (Panposh), Rourkela then, both the bail applications are taken up together analogously for their final disposal Abhishek Dhal ..... Petitioner(s) Represented By Mr. S. Sharma, Adv. Satyajit Biswal ..... Petitioner(s) Represented By Mr. S.R. Das, Adv. Page 2 of 3 through this common order. 3. I have already heard from the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned AGA for the State. 4. The co-accused person of the petitioners i.e. Subham Mishra @ Baja who was implicated with similar accusations and allegations like the petitioners has already been allowed to go on bail vide order dated 29.10.2024 passed in BLAPL No.10534 of 2024. 5. Therefore, by applying the guidelines enunciated by the Apex Court in Para No.71 in the case between Satender Kumar Antil Vrs C.B.I., I find no justification to disallow the prayer for bail of the petitioners, for which, they (petitioners) are to be allowed to go on bail with same conditions like their co-accused person. 6. Hence, both the bail applications filed by the petitioners are allowed. 7. They (petitioners) are allowed to go on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.50,000/-(rupees fifty thousand) with two solvent sureties each for the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court in seisin over the case with conditions that :- (i) They (petitioners) shall not involve with similar nature of crime in future. (ii) They (petitioners) shall appear before the court personally on each date of adjournment of the case till its conclusion. (iii) They (petitioners) shall not terrorize, coerce, influence or threat to any witnesses of the prosecution or the informant either directly or indirectly in any manner whatsoever at any stage of the trial of the case but, in case of their failure to comply any one of the aforesaid conditions, the learned trial court is authorized to cancel their respective bail orders outrightly without seeking any permission for the same from this Court. Page 3 of 3 8. Accordingly, both the bail applications filed by the petitioners are disposed of finally. 9. Grant certified copy of this order to the petitioners on their proper applications. ( A.C. Behera ) Judge Rati Ranjan Designation: Senior Stenographer Location: High Court of Orissa, Cuttack, India. Date: 10-Jan-2025 16:15:44