Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65319 (PNJ)

ROBIN LUTHRA v. STATE OF UT CHANDIGARH AND OTHERS

CWP/16188/2025 · 2025-05-29

Deepak Sibal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT Robin Luthra State of U.T., Chandigarh and others CORAM : HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Junior Panel Counsel and Ms. Anju Bansal, Advocate for respondent DEEPAK SIBAL 1. Learned counsel for the parties are through the instant petition is covered in the petitioner’s favour by a recent order dated 14.05.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in No.13776 of 2025 others. 2. In the light of the above the same terms as in May 29, 2025 vandana Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable Sr. No.116 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16188 of 2025 Date of Decision : Versus State of U.T., Chandigarh and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Tajender K. Joshi, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Sourabh Goel, Junior Panel Counsel and Ms. Anju Bansal, Advocate for respondent *** DEEPAK SIBAL, J. (Oral) Learned counsel for the parties are through the instant petition is covered in the petitioner’s favour by a recent order dated 14.05.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in No.13776 of 2025-Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and In the light of the above, the instant petition is disposed of in the same terms as in Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd.’s (DEEPAK SIBAL JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE 5 speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 16188 of 2025 (O&M) Date of Decision : 29.05.2025 …Petitioner …Respondents DEEPAK SIBAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Sourabh Goel, Junior Panel Counsel and Ms. Anju Bansal, Advocate for respondent-UT, Chandigarh. Learned counsel for the parties are ad idem that the issue raised through the instant petition is covered in the petitioner’s favour by a recent order dated 14.05.2025 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and , the instant petition is disposed of in Cannon Industries Pvt. Ltd.’s case (supra). DEEPAK SIBAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE VANDANA 2025.07.02 09:19 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document