Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65313 (BOM)

VIJAY SAKHARAM TAWASKAR v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS

CA/6166/2025 · 2025-11-07

Shri Neeraj P Dhote

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 of 2 930-CA.6166.2025.odt IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 930 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 6166 OF 2025 IN WP/5874/2022 VIJAY SAKHARAM TAWASKAR VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH SECRETARY AND OTHERS ... Mr. S. D. Nimbailkar h/f. Mr. Devdatt P. Palodkar, Advocate for Applicant; Mr. A. D. Wange, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 6-State. Ms. Anagha V. Pandit i/b. M/s. Talekar And Associates for Respondent Nos.7-A to 7-C. ... CORAM : NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J. DATE : 7th NOVEMBER, 2025 P.C.:- 1. This is an application for condonation of delay of 344 days in preferring the petition for bringing on record the legal representatives of deceased – Respondent No.7 - Mandakini Chandrakantrao Kulkarni. 2. Heard Mr. S. D. Nimbailkar holding for Mr. Devdatt Palodkar, learned Advocate for the Applicant/Petitioner; Mr. A. D. Wange, learned AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 6 and Ms. Anagha V. Pandit for proposed legal representatives. 3. The proposed legal representatives of deceased-Respondent No.7 are Respondent Nos.7-A to 7-C. According to learned Advocate for the proposed legal representatives, they are the only legal representatives of Deceased-Respondent No.7. Accordingly, the 2025:BHC-AUG:30607 2 of 2 930-CA.6166.2025.odt application is allowed in terms of prayer clause (B). 4. Necessary amendment be made in the memo of writ petition within a period of two weeks from today. 5. Application stands disposed of. 6. Thereafter, the petition be placed before this Court for admission. (NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.) Tauseef