SMT. SUMA JYOTHI W/O K. RAGHU v. K RAGU S/O K KUMAR
RPFC/100091/2022 · 2025-09-18
G Basavaraja
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65310 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65310 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12424 RPFC No. 100091 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA REV.PET FAMILY COURT NO. 100091 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SUMA @ JYOTHI W/O. K. RAGHU AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK,
2. MINOR CHANDAN SAI S/O. K. RAGHU AGED ABOUT 6 YEARS, OCC. STUDENT, SINCE MINOR REPRESENTED BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER PETITIONER NO. 1 RESIDENT OF BEHIND GOVT. GUESTS HOUSE, INDIRA NAGAR, 3RD CROSS, BALLARI - 583104. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SANTOSH B. MANE, ADVOCATE)
AND:
K. RAGU S/O. K. KUMAR AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, WORKING AT RACK TACK COMPANY PRIVATE EMPLOYEE NMDC KUMARASWAMY MINES, SANDUR BALLARI, DIST. BALLARI, R/O. DEVAGIRI POST. SANDUR TAL, DIST. BALLARI - 583104. …RESPONDENT (NOTICE TO RESPONDENT SERVED)
Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.09.20 10:56:53 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12424 RPFC No. 100091 of 2022
THIS RPFC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 19(4) OF THE FAMILY COURT ACT, 1984, PRAYING TO, CALL FOR THE LOWER COURT RECORDS PERUSE THE SAME AND ALLOW THE ABOVE PETITION BY ENHANCING THE MAINTENANCE AWARDED BY THE LEARNED PRINCIPAL JUDGE FAMILY COURT BALLARI VIDE ORDER DATED 05.01.2022 IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G BASAVARAJA)
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo for withdrawal of the petition. The memo reads as under:
“MEMO The above revision petition is filed by the petitioner questioning the order dated:5-01-2022 passed by the learned Principal Judge Family Court Ballari, in Crl Misc 84/2019. The respondent in this petition is the husband of the petitioner who died during the pendency of this Revision petition. Hence, the above petition may kindly be permitted to be withdrawn with liberty to file suit for partition of the property of the respondent.”
2. The memo is taken on record.
3. In view of the memo, the petitioner is permitted to withdraw this petition, with liberty to file a suit for
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12424 RPFC No. 100091 of 2022
partition of the petitioners’ properties, if permissible under law.
Sd/- (G BASAVARAJA) JUDGE
AC CT-CMU LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 8