IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.54639 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2025 Thana- NASRIGANJ District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1. Dharamveer Singh @ Devendra Kumar S/o Shivdayal Singh R/o Village - Sabadla, P.S - Nasriganj, District - Rohtas 2. Prince Kumar @ Prince @ Chiragan @ Prince Chiragan S/o Santosh Singh R/o Village - Sabadla, P.S - Nasriganj, District - Rohtas 3. Gorakh Singh @ Vishal Kumar S/o Ram Ekbal Singh @ Lalan Singh R/o Village - Sabadla, P.S - Nasriganj, District - Rohtas ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shashi Kant For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.Sangeeta Sharma ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 07-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State. 2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025 dated 05.03.2025 registered for the offences punishable u/s 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. 3. As per the prosecution case, total 49.3 litres of illicit country made liquor kept in a bag was recovered from the possession of the co-accused, Vijay Singh and three gallons at the bank of the Son River. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.54639 of 2025(2) dt.07-08-2025 2/2 the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. The recovery has been made from an open place which is accessible to anyone. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have no concern with the alleged recovery. The petitioner no.1 has two criminal antecedents, the petitioner nos.2 and 3 has one criminal antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioners are in custody since 15.07.2025. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioners. 6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioners above- named, are directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Rohtas in connection with Nasriganj P.S. Case No. 82 of 2025. 7. The application stands allowed. shivam/- (Chandra Prakash Singh, J) U T