IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr. Revision No. 51 of 2020 Date of Decision : 24.9.2025 Jai Gopal Sharma ....Petitioner Versus Joginder Kumar Sharma ....Respondent Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 No. For the petitioner : None. For the respondent : Mr. Hitesh Kumar, Advocate, vice Mr. Amrik Singh, Advocate. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent submits that the petitioner had expired; hence, the proceedings have abated against him and the criminal revision is dismissed as having been abated, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 24th September, 2025 (Chander) 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes.