Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.982 of 2025 ====================================================== Govind Prasad S/o Sri Chetan Prasad Resident of Flat No. 302, Sunrise Sai Plaza, Kusumpuram Colony, Gola Road, Patna - 801503, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the chief secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Under Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna
5. The Principal Secretary, General Administration Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
6. The Under Secretary (Management), Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
7. The Joint Secretary (Administration), Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
8. The Joint Secretary (Management), Water Resources Department, Government of Bihar, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (24) ======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 3 23-06-2026
Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that a proceeding under Section 43(b) of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950 has been passed against him, which has been annexed with the rejoinder. Counsel further submits that since the punishment imposed under Section 43(b) of the Bihar Pension Rules, 1950
Patna High Court CWJC No.982 of 2025(3) dt.23-06-2026 2/2 is still in force, he seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition.
3. Counsel also submits that, as per his knowledge, the said punishment order has been challenged in another writ petition. As such, he seeks liberty that, after the said punishment
order comes to an end, liberty may be granted to pursue the present petition afresh.
4. Liberty so sought is hereby granted.
5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands
disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.
Aman Kumar/- (Dr. Anshuman, J.) U