EKNATH PANDHARI PATIL AND OTHERS v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/6677/2025 · 2025-12-11
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65288 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 65288 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 965 WRIT PETITION NO. 6677 OF 2025 Eknath Pandhari Patil And Others VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Bobade Yogesh K AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. S. G. Joshi Advocate for Respondent No.4 : Mr. A. V. Indrale (Appointed) ...
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. Dated : December 11, 2025.
PER COURT :-
1. The learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to avail the alternate remedy, if available in law.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty to avail the alternate remedy, if available in law.
3. The fees of the appointed Advocate shall be paid by the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad, as per the applicable rules.
( ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. ) vj gawade/-. Page
1 of
1 2025:BHC-AUG:34763