IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 106 Reena State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. Raghav and Virender, wh have been granted regularization while the petitioner college as Lecturer, has not been considered despite there being Policy, Annexure P 16.10.2024, Annexure P any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide State counsel has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus State of Punjab and others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Deepak Sonak, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel contends that Raghav and Virender, who were working in the Drug Testing have been granted regularization while the petitioner college as Lecturer, has not been considered despite there being Policy, nnexure P-4 qua the same, regarding which a representation dated 16.10.2024, Annexure P-6, has been submitted, but it any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide it in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the its of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-15949-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 01.07.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, Mr. Manipal Singh Atwal, DAG, Punjab. Learned counsel contends that two employees, namely, in the Drug Testing Laboratory, have been granted regularization while the petitioner, working in the same college as Lecturer, has not been considered despite there being Policy, regarding which a representation dated has been submitted, but it has yet not evoked any response. He, on instructions, prays that a direction may be given to in a time bound manner, to which learned In view of the above and without commenting upon the its of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 16.10.2024, within a PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.01 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CWP-15949-2025 -2- period of 6 months, which this Court has no reason to believe the authorities would not address in a just, fair and reasonable manner. Upon doing so, after notice and hearing offered to her and if found entitled, grant the benefit forthwith. Needless to say, if the orders are adverse to her interest, the same shall contain reasons and the petitioner shall be free to seek legal redress thereupon. 01.07.2025 (AMAN CHAUDHARY) parveen kumar JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.07.01 15:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.