Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65255 (ALL)

SUBHASH v. RAJENDRA PRASAD VISHWAKARMA

A227/5738/2025 · 2025-05-29

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:93819 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 5738 of 2025 Petitioner :- Subhash Respondent :- Rajendra Prasad Vishwakarma Counsel for Petitioner :- Pankaj Baranwal Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. It is contended that against the grant of temporary injunction, the petitioner has preferred an application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made is for expeditious disposal of the same. 2. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the application under Order XXXIX Rule 4 CPC being Paper No. 42C filed in Original Case No. 1248 of 2016, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 3. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 4. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 30.5.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad