Page 1 of 3. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No.32167 of 2024 Renubala Sahani @ Behera ..... Petitioner Represented By Adv. - Partha Sarathi Das -versus- State Of Odisha & ors. ..... Opposite Parties Represented By Adv. – B.K.Sahu, A.G.A. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR MOHAPATRA ORDER 27.01.2025 Order No. 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual /Physical Mode). 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner as well as learned Additional Government Advocate for the State-Opposite Parties. Perused the writ application as well as the documents annexed thereto. 3. The Petitioner has filed the present writ application with the following prayer: “Under the aforesaid facts and circumstances, it is therefore, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to: (i) admit and allow this Writ Petition and thereby direct / order the Opp.Party No.2 to take necessary early action to consider the representation of the Petitioner pending before him under Annexure-1, taking into the account the above mentioned facts of the case, within a stipulated period, as may be prescribed by this Page 2 of 3. Hon'ble Court for the interest of justice; (ii) pass such other order(s) or issue direction(s) as may be deemed fit and proper in the bona fide interest of justice.” 4. The sole grievance of the present Petitioner in the present writ application although he has approached the Opposite Party No.2 by filing a representation dated 25.11.2024 under Annexure-1. However, no action has been taken on such representation of the Petitioner as of now. 5. Learned Additional Government Advocate on the other hand contended that in the event any representation has filed by the Petitioner and the same is still pending, she will have no objection, if this Court directs the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner strictly in accordance with law within a stipulated period of time. 6. Considering the submissions of learned counsels for the parties, on a careful examination of the background facts as well as materials on record, further keeping in view the limited nature of grievance of the Petitioner, the writ application is disposed of at the stage of admission with a direction to the Opposite Party No.2 to consider the representation of the Petitioner under Annexure-1, if the same is still pending, strictly in accordance with law & dispose of the same by passing a speaking and reasoned order within a period of eight weeks from the date of communication of a certified copy of this order. The final decision so taken by the Opposite Party No.2 be also communicated to the Petitioner within two weeks from the date of taking such a decision. Page 3 of 3. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the writ application stands disposed of. 8. Issue urgent certified copy of this order as per Rules. ( A.K. Mohapatra ) Judge Anil