Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 6521 (RAJ)

MUKESH KUMAR SON OF SHRI ANANDI LAL v. SMT. MEGHNA CHOUDHARY, SECRETARY

CMAP/18/2025 · 2025-04-01

Narendra Singh Dhaddha

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:14572] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Application No. 18/2025 Mukesh Kumar Son Of Shri Anandi Lal, Aged About 50 Years, Class-Iv Employee, Board Of Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Ajmer And Resident Of Plot No. 18, Jyoti Nagar, Nagfani, Ajmer. ----Petitioner Versus Smt. Meghna Choudhary, Secretary, Board Of Secondary Education. Rajasthan , Ajmer. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ashish Kishore Saksena, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Prahlad Singh, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA Order 01/04/2025 This civil miscellaneous application has been filed by the petitioner-applicant (for short 'the applicant') for revival of S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No. 514/2023. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that in view of the fact that the order of which contempt alleged, was stayed by the Apex Court vide order dated 21.07.2023 in Special Leave to Appeal (C) No.14894/2023, this Court vide its order dated 13.12.2023 passed in S.B. Civil Contempt Petition No.514/2023 disposed of the contempt petition with liberty to the applicant to file an application for revival of the contempt petition, if eventually the aforesaid Special Leave to Appeal is dismissed or if the necessity so arises. He further submits that now the aforesaid Special Leave to Appeal has been dismissed by the Apex Court [2025:RJ-JP:14572] (2 of 2) [CMAP-18/2025] vide order dated 27.01.2025. Thus, in view of the liberty so granted, the contempt petition may be revived. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, the order dated 13.12.2023 passed by this Court is recalled and the contempt petition is revived. Office is directed to re-register the contempt petition. (NARENDRA SINGH DHADDHA),J Jatin /94