CR-3442-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 137 CR-3442-2025 Date of decision : 10.07.2025 Balwinder Kaur ...... Petitioner versus Karamjit Singh ...... Respondent CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ JAIN Present: Mr. Dinesh Nagar, Advocate for the petitioner. **** PANKAJ JAIN, J. (Oral) 1. Report from the concerned quarter has been received. Para 5 of the report reads as under:- “5. Under these circumstances it cannot be said that the plaintiff alone is responsible for the delay in the aforesaid civil suit, rather the defendant has also been causing delay in the proceedings in the manner already mentioned above. However, it would be pertinent to mention here that perusal of the record reveals that the in fact the learned Trial Court omitted to frame issues in this case and the case was straight way fixed for evidence of the plaintiff. Accordingly, the learned Trial court would be advised to frame the issues, so that no complication arises at the final state. The report is submitted as desired by the Hon'ble High Court.” 2. Keeping in view the undertaking given by the concerned officer, this Court is sanguine that endeavour will be made to expedite the trial and decide the same, in accordance with law. 3. Accordingly, the present revision petition is disposed off. (PANKAJ JAIN) 10.07.2025 JUDGE Dinesh Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes Whether Reportable : No DINESH KUMAR 2025.07.11 16:11 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document