IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT 215-2 OMI THE STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Present: Mr. for the petitioner. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Seeking setting aside of 29.01.2020(Annexure P the benefit of respondents to release the arrear in view of the letter dated 14.02.2019 was due to the husband of the pet to 06.07.2018, Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in question is squarely Court in CWP Haryana and Others’. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. **** Mr.Ajay Chaudhary, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. **** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (ORAL) Seeking setting aside of (Annexure P-7), whereby the petitioner the benefit of regularization; and further seeking directions to the official respondents to release the arrear in view of the letter dated 14.02.2019 was due to the husband of the petitioner on his to 06.07.2018, the instant writ petition has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in squarely covered by the judgment dated CWP-5752-2020 titled as ‘Pawan Kumar Haryana and Others’. IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH CWP-16547-2025 Date of Decision: 18.07.2025 ... Petitioner STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS ... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ. Mr. Tapan Kumar, DAG, Haryana. Seeking setting aside of Office Order No.110 dated the petitioner’s husband had been denied ; and further seeking directions to the official respondents to release the arrear in view of the letter dated 14.02.2019, which itioner on his regularization w.e.f. 01.10.2003 the instant writ petition has been filed. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in judgment dated 21.04.2025 passed by this Pawan Kumar and Others Versus State of IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT .07.2025 ... Petitioner Respondents Office Order No.110 dated been denied ; and further seeking directions to the official which w.e.f. 01.10.2003 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the controversy in passed by this and Others Versus State of VISHAL SHARMA 2025.07.23 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-16547-2025 -2- Learned State Counsel is not in a position to dispute the aforesaid factual position. Disposed of in terms of judgment dated 21.04.2025 passed in the matter of ‘Pawan Kumar and Others (supra). (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) JULY 18, 2025. JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.07.23 18:43 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document