Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 65183 (PNJ)

SMT ANJU v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/15897/2025 · 2025-07-11

Alok Jain, Sudhir Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1. Writ in the nature of Certificate’ to the petitioner in respect of plot No.614 sq. yards situated in Surya Enclave has already been made long back and possession has also been handed over to the petitioner. 2. petitioner wo -1- Present Writ Petition herein, Writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents Certificate’ to the petitioner in respect of plot No.614 sq. yards situated in Surya Enclave Jalandhar, qua which entire payment has already been made long back and possession has also been handed over to the petitioner. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner would be satisfied, in case, his Legal Notice Petition herein, inter alia, is for issuance of a Mandamus directing the respondents to issue ‘No Due Certificate’ to the petitioner in respect of plot No.614-A-1 measuring 200 Jalandhar, qua which entire payment has already been made long back and possession has also been handed over earned counsel for the petitioner submits that uld be satisfied, in case, his Legal Notice dated 07.04.2025 for issuance of a to issue ‘No Due 1 measuring 200 Jalandhar, qua which entire payment has already been made long back and possession has also been handed over earned counsel for the petitioner submits that 07.04.2025 SANDEEP SETHI 2025.07.16 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment (Annexure P not been adverted to by the respondents till date. 3. learned State submits that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by No.3 and it shall take decision either way, on 07.04.2025 4. seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. 5. disposed of with a direction to representation dated an appropriate preferably within a period of 06 weeks production of this order. -2- (Annexure P-6) is considered and decided by respondent No.3 not been adverted to by the respondents till date. On the other hand, on advance service of copy of petition, State counsel appears and opposes issuance of n that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by and it shall take decision either way, on (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner. Given the nature of order being passed, seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or pleadings are required. Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is disposed of with a direction to respondent No.3 ation dated 07.04.2025 (Annexure P an appropriate reasoned order, in accordance with law, at the earliest preferably within a period of 06 weeks from the date of receipt of copy/ production of this order. d and decided by respondent No.3, which has not been adverted to by the respondents till date. on advance service of copy of petition, appears and opposes issuance of notice of motion. He that grievance of the petitioner will be looked into by respondent and it shall take decision either way, on the representation dated 6) of the petitioner. Given the nature of order being passed, there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is respondent No.3 to consider the (Annexure P-6) of the petitioner and pass order, in accordance with law, at the earliest, from the date of receipt of copy/ has on advance service of copy of petition, otice of motion. He respondent the representation dated there is no necessity to seek reply by any of the respondents as no further proceedings and/or Without commenting on merits of the case, the petition is the the petitioner and pass , from the date of receipt of copy/ SANDEEP SETHI 2025.07.16 13:10 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this Order/Judgment